Tuesday, May 26, 2009

I'm Having A Relapse

After complaining for the last two weeks to different people about Eminem's new album entitled “Relapse”, I decided this is a great subject to blog on. Normally, I don't give two shits, one fuck, or even half a god-damn about reviews or reviewers. The last time I read an accurate review of anything it was for the movie The Happening. Mark Walhberg’s prosthetic dick in "Boogie Nights" was more believable than the plot line in that movie. (No homo) I can sum The Happening up in three words: Do Not Watch. But I digress…



My complaints were not about Eminem’s album per say, but about the reaction it would garner from the media, reviewers, bloggers, commenters, etc. If you are a fan of music…shit, if you can hear at all, you can deduct that artists such as Lil’ Wayne, Cam’ron, Rick Ross, and those of that caliber, do not have the lyrical ability of Jay-Z, Eminem, Black Thought, just to name a few.

Typical Cam’ron line from the opening credits of House M.D.

“We in the house, lookin like Doogie Howser/Always lookin down, must be on downers”

You like how I used House’s name in the line while comparing him to another doctor from a tv series? Then I came back around, mentioned how he looks down when giving directions, and compared that to his use of Vicodin (a downer).

I have a list of three points that explains the problems with perception of quality music:

Point 1: Fuck Nahright. I have visited nahright.com 269 times in the last month. 269! Averaging out to around nine visits a day, I still think the site is garbage. There is too much bad music floating around on Eskay’s blog. Let me explain. On these rap blogs, I rarely see the top artists getting appreciated as there is too much hating and too much dick riding to stay sane. I’ll use "Nahright" as the prime example because they are the top hip-hop blog on the internet. Too many no name, talentless, fake, wack ass niggas are getting air time on the blog. The first person I blame is Dre. He’s one of the three moderators and the only one from the south, yet he limits his range to the typical hip-hop blog “must haves” and then he tosses in every Rick Ross song he can find and every other lame artist he personally stamps with a “Co-Sign” as the readers share his taste in horrible music. People like to hear a correctional officer rap about being the biggest drug kingpin in Miami. People believe Rick Ross. They really fucking do. But, if he really was the biggest kingpin, his fat ass would be lying dead in front of a mall like Dolla. 50 Cent already exposed Rick Ross, Louis Vuitton even sent a letter to XXL claiming that Officer Ricky wore counterfeit sunglasses on their magazine cover. Aside from the continuous flow of Red Café and Drake posts performing the same songs or with new horrible “Nahright/New Music Cartel Remixes”, I don’t really have any complaints about Eskay or Nation. I would go in and destroy the commenters on Nahright, but I think Joe Budden says it best.

Point 2: Fuck Music “Fans”. You motherfuckers think that Lil’ Wayne is the best rapper alive? Really? I will make this concession: he’s not the worse rapper alive. He doesn’t write his own lyrics evidenced by Young Money rappers openly claiming they have written songs for him (his assistant wrote "Prom Queen" and Drake admitted to doing a reference track). Want to know why Lil’ Wayne sounded much improved on Drake’s “So Far Gone”? It’s because Drake wrote Lil’ Wayne’s verses for him. A typical Wayne verse is a bunch of metaphors each line. Nobody cries for him to have more content. They are happy with him saying this “I'm on my feet like Tough Actin' Tinactin/I'm runnin' this shit, you should try tacklin”. That’s from a Rick Ross song entitled “Maybach Music 2”. Which in itself is an interesting title because out of T-Pain on the hook and Kanye and Wayne on the other two verses, Rick Ross is, ironically, the only one who can’t afford a Maybach. This song was and still is a hit. Today, all you need is a solid beat and a catchy hook, because the verses don’t matter. When there are lyrically superior verses on a track, nobody cares. If people wanted great verses then Lupe Fiasco’s The Cool would have sold millions. Instead, we get Soulja Boy literally rapping catch phrases all the way to the bank. People buy the shittiest music, support the least talented acts, and then get mad when I say I don’t listen to Lil’ Wayne. Or that I haven’t heard “that new song by [insert shitty artist]. It’s not just rap. It’s all music, especially pop music, and even more particularly "hip-pop" as I call it. Lil’ Wayne can make an entire song about using every drug known to man, but let anybody else do it and it’s all negative reviews.

Point 3: Fuck Critics. I’m not a journalist. I hate writing. I do know one thing though, it’s not a job of a reviewer to completely defecate on a record and turn around and praise garbage. I read one review from Sputnikmusic. Yeah, I don’t know who they are either, but they have the lowest review of “Relapse” on Metacritic. The beginning of his critique has a summary written by the author:

Summary: It's about 10% as good as The Marshall Mathers LP, so how much did you enjoy that?”

10%? Where did you get that number? I will admit that Eminem’s second album is one of the best rap albums of all time. There are 15 tracks on “Relapse". I should only like 1.5 tracks on the new album right? I guess I could like half a song. This guy is a math genius. Too bad you can’t compare two objects like that. “Hey Bill do you like Kobe Bryant? Well you know he’s only 80% as good as Jordan." “Lebron is 104% better than Kobe." Would you go around describing people and objects like this? One commenter on his review said “I liked The Marshall Mathers LP 10% so that means I’ll like this one 1%." That’s not even the length of one song’s hook. Are you sure you want to follow this math whiz’s logic? Yes he could have been one of the astrophysicists helping the astronauts reach the Hubble Telescope, but he decided he was much more needed at Sputnikmusic writing music reviews.

I’m sorry jackass but your review completely undermines itself when you state “Dre’s verse on [Old Time’s Sake] however is up to his usual standards." For those who don’t know, Dr. Dre doesn't write his own rhymes. He never did. He’s a producer. All those verses you've heard him say were written by the top artists in the game, mainly by Eminem. Reviewers and critics like to think they are good at their job. Some are, some aren’t. Just like rap. If you already hate an artist, don’t write a review about them. I wouldn’t write a review about a Soulja Boy album. You don’t have to like an artist, but you can’t dismiss their work without giving them a fighting chance. I could never listen to a Soulja Boy song. He could make the best record ever and I still wouldn’t give it a listen. Which is exactly why you don’t see me listening and then reviewing his work. I automatically consider it trash and will openly say so.

"I'm like: fuck critics, you can kiss my whole asshole/If you don't like my lyrics, you can press fast forward..."

I'm not going to review the album for you. You should go and listen to it and decide for yourself who's right. Just ponder this...

In terms of greatness, what are you expecting from Eminem? If you’re expecting him to be the next Jordan, then say so. If you think he’s a starter who’s playing like a scrub, then admit it. If you think he’s a scrub who is getting starter minutes or even All-Star consideration, let’s hear it. If he’s too inconsistent with his material then let me know that, too.

This article was written without my swag being on.




14 comments:

MHJ said...

Lil Wayne is amusing. Officer Ross is a fraud. I stopped reading Nah Right when they started talking about how Lil Wayne was the greatest rapper alive... um NO!

Woodius Maximus said...

Beautiful post brethren.

John H. said...

Hey, I don't know if you realize but on sputnikmusic the scale rating for good is 3-5. Thus, considering if Marshall Mathers is a 5, and Relapse is 10% of that on the good spectrum of things, it ends up being a 3.2, does it not?

Of course 10% is an arbitrary number picked in an arbitrary comparison just to express a simple point: Relapse is a decent album that will always live in the shadow of a record from the past, and fans will never over that. Now, I assume you have read my review where you picked out that Dre line (I don't know where I implied he wrote it, but apparently I did), so I also assume you realize that I actually generally liked the record. I don't get what your point is actually I'm just up at 3 AM (get it) and have nothing better to do than refute a no name blog attacking my mediocre review on a no name website.

John H. said...

Did I not just explain the in the spectrum of "good" on the site, the scale is a 3-5? So, 2 point separate something from being merely good to being "classic", so 10% of 2 is .2. Get where I got that from? The reason for my rating of 1 is for two reasons: First, I simply disagree with the way my site rates albums, and really don't think number quantification does any justification. I could have tagged the review with a 3, but that still wouldn't have really expressed all my thoughts on the album, as no number really does for any review. Secondly, I *objectively* believe that no, in the grand scheme of things and people the album is not good, as much as I may enjoy it. Anyone who actually reads the review will understand this, and it's not really my problem if they don't bother to read even the first paragraph.

History lesson on the site: The site started as a user review site. There were no "professional" reviews or whatever, and everyone just reviewed what they want because they really wanted to write about them. "Staff" was established in 2007, after I reviewed said "Kidz Bop" album which was done for (holy shit no way!) THE LULZ. And once again, you are paying way too much mind to quanitfying with the ratings scale, which is another awful reasons about attaching numbers to something (remember my first post with all that arbitrary nonsense?).

In a serious twist, I bet there are TONS of people who like Encore more than Relapse. Give Relapse time to settle before you say that.

I put in as much effort (comparatively, on a review level) as I thought Eminem put into the album. I never deducted points because it's not as great as some classic material, its because it plain and simple wasn't good, and the easiest comparison is said classic material. Relapse does compared to most music out there suck as a whole, but that's not really important. I couldn't care less if people want me to re-write my review because of their overanalyzed issues with it, just as I'm sure Eminem couldn't care less if people want him to re-record Relapse because of their overanalyzed issues with it. Obviously giving myself way too much creative credit here, but yeah.

did not bookmark I am very upset with you >:o

HarriMac said...

John H statistically speaking your bullshit rates a 1.0 on a likert scale of bullshit with 1.0 being dumb and 5.0 being the best thing I've ever read. Get a life dude - if you seriously think that if you slam somebody's fucking blog about their review of your reviews and somebody else's music and it makes you cool, you seriously need some kindergartners to school you on 'how not to be a self-absorbed asshole'

Woodius Maximus said...

Hey John, how'd you find our blog anyway? And apparently you're no "no name" if you're score is compiled into a bunch of reviews on metacritic.com

John H. said...

How am I slamming somebody's fucking blog here? He attacked my review and I defended it, I don't know how that makes me attacking the blog or trying to make me cool.

Somebody else on staff posted this link in a thread as a "lol john" thing. I don't know what else you are trying to say there Woodius so eh.

MHJ said...

I haven't laughed this hard since the Roman Catholic priestess who only preaches at Baptist churches tried to give Obama a letter against gay marriage (and with anthrax in it?).

Woodius Maximus said...

John, I was just curious as to how you found our blog, because it's difficult to locate.

I know you run a joke review website, which is cool, but it's unfair to people who want to read well-thought out reviews and your joke gets put on Metacritic.com.
You admit that you like it, yet give it a bad rating....makes no sense to me.

I wouldn't have co-signed Tai Rice for going on like he did, IF he wasn't 100% accurate. Sorry John, but you lost. I know you probably didn't mean for your review to end up on Metacritic.com (which is a credible site), but it did. And that's what all this is about.

And no shit people are probably going to just read the first paragraph. Most people are only going to just care about the score, which on metacritic.com, Sputnik or whatever the hell your site's name is, listed it as a "20" out of 100.

That is how I know you either didn't listen. You don't know hip-hop enough to know that just the flows and rhyme/patterns he used alone push the album to the 60's-70's. Subject matter takes a backseat. (it's Eminem; killing, drugs and relationships is what you get).

Tai Rice said...

You either loved it or hate it
Every CD, critics gave it a three
And three years later they’d go back and rerate it
And call the Slim Shady LP the greatest
The Marshall Mathers was a classic
The Eminem Show was fantastic
But Encore just didn’t have caliber to match
I guess enough time just ain’t pass yet
A couple years more that shit’ll be Illmatic
And eight years later I’m still at it
-Eminem/Be Careful What You Wish For

John, I’m sincere when I say I appreciate you commenting on my blog and defending your own work. I’m still confused with your math on rating “Relapse” 3.2. You gave it a 1 and you said that you disagree with the way your site rates albums. You can’t say that you could have given it a 3 OR a 1. Even if you don’t believe that quantification does any justification (which I somewhat agree with) you must follow the standards set by your site. The reason Metacritic uses Sputnikmusic.com’s reviews is because there is a confidence by Metacritic that the reviewers are doing a good job.

I attacked your review, yet you admittedly said yourself in earlier comments that it was “mediocre” and “put in as much effort (comparatively, on a review level) as I thought Eminem put into the album”. My point about your review is that you have a responsibility to yourself as a reviewer, sputnikmusic.com, metacritic.com, Eminem fans, and music fans in general to give a strongly argued review. You should not mail it in. Your review affects the average rating of “Relapse” on Metacritic and is listed among “Professional Reviews” on Wikipedia.

Eminem can always put out a new album and change public opinion if he puts out bad material. Once a critic influences public opinion, it’s hard to change the public’s mind.

This comment was written after remembering that people still believe Barack Obama is a Muslim and Socialist

Anonymous said...

DAMN

John H. said...

I am not the one who found your website, I honestly have no idea.

"I know you run a joke review website, which is cool, but it's unfair to people who want to read well-thought out reviews and your joke gets put on Metacritic.com."

What the hell are you talking about? I in no way run the website, and most of the staff don't agree with the way I review things. IF you actually looked at the site, you will see that I am the only person who really does any kind of humorous reviewing. Here is the thing: Metacritic pre-screens all reviews that they post, and for whatever reason they decided to include it. They also have a policy of changing the score that appears on the site, and they did not do that. I post my reviews in the context of sputnikmusic, where anyone who has ever followed the site for a second would realize it's tongue in cheek. I would have completely understood metacritic not posting it, but alas they did.

I don't knoq hip hop or you and I have different versions on what makes hip hop good? Debatable, although by your comment I don't see where we differ greatly.

Anyways, onto Tai's post, that song should have been on Relapse because it is legitly great.

The site I write for has bullshit politics that I simply don't agree with. My rating of a 1 is simply a way for me to express my belief to the "head muckity-mucks" as opposed to just words in a post. We have had dealings with metacritic in the past which detailed what I said before, so if metacritic did not agree with my rating and review, they could have easily screened it out.

You are putting far too much credit to my review. I do not write for the Rolling Stone, nor do I pretend to be the end all of music criticism. I guess you could say my "gimmick" (far from it, but I can't really think of a better word) is that I really am pretty much a gigantic music fan/nerd that knows how to string sentences together nicely. My reviews are not always meant to be "strongly argued" but rather a more casual pass through of the album, as most listeners do not delve into such serious intricacies as the fact that Underground is in 5/8 et all.

I can't wait until the day I am on CNN to convince people that a 50 year old eminem is still relevant enough to cause major controversy.

John H. said...

Oh and if I did not get this point across well enough, I DO NOT IN ANY WAY RUN/OWN sputnikmusic. I am merely a staff writer who 90% of the rest of the staff wishes would shut the hell up already about this most likely.

Woodius Maximus said...

Ok, I understand where you are coming from.